<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rhythmeering &#187; Scenarios</title>
	<link>http://www.rhythmeering.com</link>
	<description>The Unified Field Of Knowledge</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Evolution of Strategic Planning and Scenario Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.rhythmeering.com/2007/04/18/the-evolution-of-strategic-planning-and-scenario-thinking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhythmeering.com/2007/04/18/the-evolution-of-strategic-planning-and-scenario-thinking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lr</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Scenarios]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Strategic Goals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhythmeering.com/2007/04/18/the-evolution-of-strategic-planning-and-scenario-thinking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pointing out the inflexibilities in traditional methodologies for strategic scenario development, the author of the Mapping Strategy blog suggests as I have, that jazz offers an improved approach:
When people think of scenarios, they often think of stories. Such stories have a specific sequence: this happens, which causes that, which triggers this other thing, which results [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pointing out the inflexibilities in traditional methodologies for strategic scenario development, the author of the <a href="http://cartegic.typepad.com/">Mapping Strategy</a> blog suggests <a href="http://www.rhythmeering.com/docs/JazzAndTheFutureOfGlobalE-Commerce.pdf">as I have</a>, that jazz offers an improved approach:</p>
<blockquote><p>When people think of scenarios, they often think of stories. Such stories have a specific sequence: <em>this happens, which causes that, which triggers this other thing, which results in the world looking as follows</em>. <strong>Most scenarios also tend to be <em>monolithic</em>. That is, singular. Typical scenario &#8216;architecture&#8217; is all of a piece - difficult to deconstruct, much less reassemble in new ways.</strong></p>
<p>&#8230; In the content industries such boundaries are clearly starting to break down, as things like digital editing tools and blogs enable creative improvisation, re-use, and jazz-like riffs on others&#8217; thoughts and works. That topic and its intersection with copyright evolution is a big one unto itself. I use it here merely to point out how strategic thinking processes are long overdue for a similar process of modularization and opening-up.</p>
<p>&#8230; What is the antidote to all this? Modularity. Lego blocks. Tinker Toys. Mad Libs. The computer industry after the mid 1990&#8217;s. The automotive industry of today. Jazz.</p>
<p><a href="http://cartegic.typepad.com/mapping_strategy/2005/08/effective_scena.html">Effective Scenarios  Part IV: Modularity</a></p></blockquote>
<p>This is a very insightful resource I&#8217;ll be spending more time with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhythmeering.com/2007/04/18/the-evolution-of-strategic-planning-and-scenario-thinking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
