<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rhythmeering &#187; Interpretations</title>
	<link>http://www.rhythmeering.com</link>
	<description>The Unified Field Of Knowledge</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Rhythms In Business</title>
		<link>http://www.rhythmeering.com/2007/05/23/rhythms-in-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhythmeering.com/2007/05/23/rhythms-in-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lr</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Interpretations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jazz]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Simulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhythmeering.com/2007/05/23/rhythms-in-business/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a rapidly changing marketplace, customers aren&#8217;t always able to articulate clearly their wants and needs; even when they can, you may not have time to analyze their input and then design and offer a solution. Even with the best strategic planning and business intelligence, competitors can appear on the scene at any time and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a rapidly changing marketplace, customers aren&#8217;t always able to articulate clearly their wants and needs; even when they can, you may not have time to analyze their input and then design and offer a solution. Even with the best strategic planning and business intelligence, competitors can appear on the scene at any time and disruptive technologies can surface. Sustaining success is an open-ended process, not a project to be completed. To maintain your success, you need to interpret the participants and conditions of the ecosystem around you.</p>
<blockquote><p>The manager of the interpretive organization needs to act less like an engineer and more like the leader of a jazz combo. Diverse components need to be brought together – musicians, instruments, solos, themes, tempos, an audience – but their roles and their relationships are changing all the time. The goal is not to arrive at a fixed and final shape, but to channel the work in a way that both influences and fulfills the listener&#8217;s – the customer&#8217;s expectations. The interpretive manager, unlike the analytical manager, embraces ambiguity and improvisation as essential to innovation. She seeks openings, not endings.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Interpretive Management<br />
Harvard Business Review March-April 1998</p></blockquote>
<p>Two keys to interpreting are to be able to identify and optimize critical transitions and to identify and synchronize with the rhythms of your business.<br />
Transitions</p>
<p>The points at which  businesses move from one thing – product, season, advertising campaign, development project – to another are incredibly complex junctures. They typically involve large numbers of people who either never work together or, perhaps worse, have worked together but not always cooperatively. Because of their relative infrequency (and often their lack of regularity or periodicity), managers have little or no training to deal with them and fewer opportunities to learn from experience how to manage them. Communication falters. Missteps occur.</p>
<p>In a March-April 1998 article from Harvard Business Review, the effect of handling a transition well or poorly was summed up nicely:</p>
<blockquote><p>When transitions are poor, businesses lose position, stumble, and fall behind.  In contrast, companies that manage by time pacing learn to choreograph important transitions - and to shorten the time it takes to execute them.</p></blockquote>
<p>Dealilng with transitions benefits greatly from certain aspects of the jazz ensemble paradigm, as that same article continues:</p>
<blockquote><p>The best transitions do more than simply take a company from point A to point B. Managers can actually use these transitions to learn, reflect, change direction, and accomplish other goals.<br />
<a href="http://harvardbusinessonline.hbsp.harvard.edu/b01/en/common/item_detail.jhtml?id=98202">Harvard Business Review March-April 1998<br />
Time Pacing: Competing In Markets That Won&#8217;t Stand Still</a></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p> <a href="http://www.rhythmeering.com/docs/JazzAndTheFutureOfGlobalE-Commerce.pdf">Taken from Jazz and the Future of Global E-Commerce</a></p></blockquote>
<p>See also recent posts - <a href="http://www.meshverse.com/2007/05/23/business-mesh/">Business Mesh</a> on my other blog and the <a href="http://www.rhythmeering.com/2007/05/23/ibm-and-the-simulation-factor/">Simulations Factor</a> here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhythmeering.com/2007/05/23/rhythms-in-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
